Bible
Authority
Lesson Four: The Bible Part II
1. Only two choices:
When asked the question, “Who is Jesus?” we often point out to people that one cannot claim that Jesus was a good man, a good religious teacher, but not God-Jesus did not give one that choice. The same is true with the Bible.
Some want to believe that the
Bible is a good book, a good guide for life, helpful and practical, but not the
Word of God, and certainly not some standard by which we will be judged. BUT
THE BIBLE DOESN'T CLAIM TO BE MERELY A GOOD PIECE OF LITERATURE (John 12:48; James 1:21; 2 Timothy 3:16-17). The Bible is either the Word of God, or it
is the worst book ever written. For a
book that makes the false claim to be the Word of God, is a book guilty of
blasphemy. There is no middle
ground.
2.
Scientifically
Accurate:
It shouldn’t surprise us, that
the Bible is scientifically accurate for the Bible claims that the same God Who
created the Universe (Genesis 1:1), is the same God Who authored this
book (2 Timothy 3:16). Therefore,
the Bible was authored by the Creator and therefore, biblical truth and
scientific truth should always agree.
Points to Note:
·
The
Bible doesn’t contain any of the scientific mistakes current and popular at the
time it was written. Belief in the
spontaneous generation of life was commonly held in the ancient world (as it is
today among evolutionary scientists), but the Bible clearly affirms that life
comes from life and that after its kind (Genesis 1:11).
·
Moses
was trained in all the wisdom of the ancient Egyptians, but he taught that God
created man in His own image and likeness (Acts 7:22; Genesis 1:26-27). Moses wrote the first five books of the
Old Testament, and yet those books contain none of the superstitions and myths,
which were believed by the Egyptians.
·
The
Bible contains many examples of scientific foreknowledge, that is, verses that
reveal secrets about the physical world, long before man discovered such
truths.
1.
Life
only comes from existing life (Genesis 1:11). This truth really wasn’t established until the 19th
century A.D.
2.
The
earth is round (Isaiah 40:22, 740 B.C.).
Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) was the first secular thinker
to conclude that the earth was round, but unfortunately, other than his
personal students, few were convinced by his arguments.
3.
The
earth is not supported (Job 26:7) (2000 B.C.?). Prior to 1543 A.D., many believed that the earth was
rigidly supported and all movement was in the heavens.
4.
The
Oceans contain deep recesses (Job 38:16) (2000 B.C.). Prior to 1504 A.D., the universal
opinion was that the ocean bottoms were flat, sandy beds like our deserts.
5.
The Ocean Currents (Psalm 8:8) (1000 B.C.). Secular scientists did not discover
these ocean currents or sea-lanes until 1855 A.D.
6.
The Water-Vapor Cycle (Ecclesiastes 1:7) (1000
B.C.).
7. The
First Law of Thermodynamics (Genesis 2:1-2)(1500 B.C.), that is no new
matter is being created, did not become a law of physics until after 1841
A.D.
8. The
Second Law of Thermodynamics (Hebrews 1:10-12) (63 A.D.), this is the
truth that the universe is wearing out and running down. Again, man did not discover this truth until
after 1850 A.D.
A host of other
examples could be cited. For more
information on this topic read, “Has God Spoken” by A.O. Schnabel.
3. The Bible Has Been Attacked, But Always Proven Right:
To this day people say the
Bible is in error about such things as the Creation happening in six days, or
Noah’s flood being universal, and so on.
But the Bible has been attacked for centuries by human thinkers who
thought they knew more than God. Time
and time again, the Bible has proven the skeptics wrong.
·
There are no less than
48 references to the Hittites in the Old Testament, but they were unknown
outside the Bible until near the end of the 19th century. Some critics of the Bible boldly stated that
the Bible was wrong. It is now known
that the Hittites not only did exist as the Bible says, but they were a great
and powerful people during Old Testament times.
·
Sargon II, king of
Assyria between 721-705 B.C. is mentioned only in Isaiah 20:1. Once again, ancient human writers knew
nothing of him and some did not hesitate to deny that he every existed. Sargon's palace was found in 1843.
·
The same argument could
be made on behalf of the Bible’s scientific Foreknowledge. For centuries, secular thinkers argued that
the earth was flat, that life spontaneously arises, and a host of other
incorrect theories. One thing we should
learn that is that Bible has always been right has always been ahead of secular
ideas.
When we say that Bible is inerrant,
we mean that it is infallibly correct, and that it is free from error. Such a conclusion must be reached from the
following facts: 1. God is all-powerful and has the ability to
preserve His Word. 2. God was able to preserve the Old Testament
Scriptures (Matthew 5:17-18), how much more the New Testament which
contains a better covenant? 3. Jesus promised us that His word would
outlast the physical universe (Matthew 24:35). 4. Peter declared
that the Word of God is incorruptible (1 Peter 1:23).
Point to Note:
When people argue that the
Bible has been corrupted, they are very shortsighted. First, such a claim denies God’s power (Matthew 22:29), and
His promises (1 Peter 1:23). Secondly,
a corrupted gospel couldn’t save anyone, for we wouldn’t know what is error and
what is truth.
Sometimes it is good to
force people to see and accept the logical consequences of a false theory they
have embraced. Too many just assume
that a corrupted Bible lets them off the hook with God. The common reasoning is, 'If the Bible has
been corrupted, then God can't condemn us for not following His word.” Many people view a corrupted Bible as a
mistrial. First we need to be impressed
that we are lost before we ever come into contact with the Bible (Mark
16:15-16).
God has a different view on this
matter. Notice how God argues in 1
Corinthians 15:14-19. God says, “And if
Christ has not been raised, then...” (15:14). And most people would answer
God's question, '”Then we are all off the hook”. I mean, if Jesus wasn't raised, then He isn't the Son of God, and
therefore we have nothing to fear in not obeying God. But God doesn't give the above popular conclusion. Rather, God says, “...Then your faith also
is vain YOU ARE STILL IN YOUR SINS'”(15:17).
The same type of argument or conclusion must follow the contention, “AND
IF THE BIBLE HAS BEEN CORRUPTED, IF IT IS UNTRUSTWORTHLY, IF IT IS FILLED WITH
ERROR, IF IT IS MISSING VALUABLE AND PRECIOUS TRUTHS, THEN YOU ARE STILL IN
YOUR SINS.” For if our only
communication with God is unreliable, then how do we know what pleases
Him? We can't trust our own judgment
(Proverbs 16:25), and the will of God can't be known, unless He reveals it (1
Corinthians 2:9-13). A corrupted Bible
would mean that everyone is in the same boat, the lost boat! The ship of fools! A corrupted Bible doesn't give us an "out", rather such
a tragedy would mean that we are all hopelessly lost. For if we can't know the truth, then how can
we find salvation? (John 8:32) A
corrupted Bible would be a blind guide (Matthew 15:14).
Most people who argue or suggest that the
Bible we possess isn't trustworthy and has been mistranslated or corrupted in
some way, are simply echoing an opinion they have heard. Such is even true of many of the so-called
"experts". For example,
Thomas Paine (1737-1809) wrote a passionate attack upon the Bible called 'The
Age Of Reason'. “His qualification for
such a task may be illustrated by the following admission. In discussing a passage in the book of Job,
Paine says, "I recollect not enough of the passages of Job to insert them
correctly..for I keep no Bible (p. 133).
Again: "[When] I began the
former part of The Age of Reason, I had, besides, neither Bible nor Testament
to refer to, though I was writing against both (p. 71). So much for "scholarship" (Reason
& Revelation. 12/94 p. 92). Thus when someone claims that the Bible has
been corrupted, inaccurately translated, etc. ask them to: (a)
Give you a specific example, a precise passage, and the exact words in
that passage that don't belong there-and proof that they don't belong. (b) If you believe it is wrong then what did
the passage originally say? (c) A specific example of a Biblical doctrine that
has been lost, perverted, added or misrepresented.
The belief that the Bible is inerrant is
so fundamental, for once people start believing that the Bible might contain
historical or scientific errors; it is very easy to believe that the Bible is
also mistaken in terms of various moral and spiritual issues. Today, some who insist that homosexuality is
all right simply dismiss passages such as Romans 1:18-32 as being
written when people were ignorant about the true cause of such behaviors. Thus, the Bible is no longer the standard,
but the latest popular human opinions.
The
Bible Needs No Revision
1. When
we say, revision, we are not talking about new translations or versions,
but of revising the content of the Bible.
God says His world abides forever (1 Peter 1:24-25). Remember, the Old Testament was never
“revised”, and applied to everyone under that covenant from beginning to
end. The same is true in the New
Testament. The words that Jesus spoke
while on this earth will judge all mankind at the last day (John 12:48).
2. In
addition, a tremendous amount of manuscript evidence exists for the Old and
especially the New Testament. The
conclusion in studying all these ancient copies of the Scriptures is the following:
"Recently the sands
of Egypt have yielded even earlier copies of New Testament books from about
A.D. 200-250..these copies preserve large portions of the N.T.-Luke, Acts, much
of the Pauline Epistles and Revelation..What do these copies look like? They differ from the text of the King James
Version only in details. It may be said
in general that these earliest manuscripts show a text practically the same as
that used in the American Revised Version...Anyone can therefore test for
himself approximately how much variation there is among these manuscripts by
comparing these two versions. (The KJV and ASV) There is one fragment of John called the Rylands Papyrus dated
about A.D. 125. It is extremely early,
being written within thirty years of the original copy..A translation of it
reads exactly like the American Revised Version. These facts reinforce the famous dictum of Westcott and Hort that
not one-tenth of one per cent of the text of the New Testament is in dispute,
and none of this concerns any doctrine of faith." ("The Problem of
Communication". R. Laird Harris. In: "The Bible The Living Word of
Revelation. p. 97). My question would
be, if this is the integrity of the text of New Testament books, and such
reflects the great care taken in copying those books that were viewed as the
word of God, then how can anyone seriously argue that while error didn't creep
into the text, whole books were lost?
They meticulously copied, preserved, and even died for 27 books, while
others, equally inspired were so carelessly handled that they ended up lost?
Many Christians and
non-Christians are unaware that various "lists" of inspired books
were in existence long before the Church Councils of later centuries. "The earliest list of New Testament
books, of which we have definite knowledge, was drawn up at Rome by the heretic
Marcion about 140 A.D...Another early list..dated about the end of the second
century, is that commonly called the 'Muratorian Fragment'..it evidently
mentioned Matthew and Mark, because it refers to Luke as the third Gospel; then
it mentions John, Acts, Paul's nine letters to churches and four to
individuals..Jude, two Epistles of John, and the Apocalypse of John..it adds
that other letters circulating under Paul's name were not accepted by the
Church..The Shepherd of Hermas is mentioned as worthy to be read (i.e. in the
church) but not to be included in the number of prophetic or apostolic
writings...Eusebius (c. 265-340) mentions as generally acknowledged all the
books of our New Testament except James, Jude, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, which
were disputed by some, but recognized by the majority. Athanasius in 367 lays down the twenty-seven
books of our New Testament as alone canonical; shortly afterwards Jerome and
Augustine followed his example in the West..The first ecclesiastical councils
to classify the canonical books were both held in North Africa--at Hippo Regius
in 393 and at Carthage in 397--but what these councils did was not to impose
something new upon the Christian communities but to codify what was ALREADY the
general practice of those communities" (The New Testament
Documents: Are They Reliable? F.F.
Bruce pp. 22-27).
Someone has noted that only God could
“revise” the Bible, seeing that it is an inspired document and that no man can
inherently tell the difference between truth and error in the spiritual realm (Jeremiah
10:23). But since God has never
issued an up-dated Bible, such is proof that the Bible we possess today is the
Word of God.
The
Bible is The Standard of Judgment at the Last Day
1. We
will be judged by the teachings of Jesus (John 12:48).
2. Sins
condemned in the First Century will still be wrong at the last day (Galatians
5:21; 1 Cor. 6:9-11).
The
Bible is All Sufficient
1. Jesus
claimed that “all truth” would be revealed through the apostles (John
16:13).
2. Scriptures
make the man of God equipped for every good work (2 Timothy 3:16-17).
3. The
faith, what Christians must believe, has once for all been delivered to God’s
people (Jude 3).
4. The
mystery has been revealed (Ephesians 3:3-5).
5. God
has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3).
6. There
is no promise of future revelation, another covenant, additional truth, another
Messiah, and so on.
7. Compare
with the Old Testament. God spoke up to
a point and then stopped speaking. Old
Testament revelation ended with the book of Malachi.
8. The
creeds of men are not needed. If a
creed contains more than the New Testament contains it contains too much. If it contains less than the New Testament
contains it contains too little. The
underlying basis for religious creeds is that the Bible is too complicated and
must be explained to the common person, that is, men can say things better than
God said them. Rather, God says He has
given us everything we need and what we need is revealed in the Scriptures (2
Timothy 3:16-17). In addition, for
Scripture to equip us in reference to all good works, it must be understandable
to the person who wants to be involved in those good works.