Advanced Search Page
 
 

Qualifications of the Elder
Part 2

Who may be an elder? God says he “must be one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity, (but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?); and not a new convert, lest he become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil. And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he may not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil” 1 Timothy 3:4-7

3:4 “He must be one who manages”: This indicates that the elder must presently rule his household well, and is obviously not an optional requirement. “Manages”: “To be over, superintend, preside over” (Thayer, p. 539). To stand before, lead, attend to, indicating care and diligence (Vine, p. 307). Be at the head of, rule, and direct (Arndt, p. 707). “Well”: “Rightly, so that there shall be no room for blame” (Thayer, p. 323). “Fitly, appropriately, in the right way” (Arndt, p. 401). “Keeping his children under control”: That is keeping them over control, having obedient children. “Children”: Note that the term “children” can apply to children who are little as well as children who are grown adults (1 Timothy 1:2, 18; 5:4). “With all dignity”: Honor, purity, reverence, seriousness, respectfulness. It would appear that the “dignity” applies not merely to the children, but to how the elder keeps his children under control. He is a dignified father, that is, he does not have to yell at his children or threaten them to keep them in subjection. “Denotes the dignified way in which the father will secure the obedience of his children” (Hiebert, p. 67).

3:5 “But if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?”: Here is given the reason for the qualification. The results that a man gets with his own family will be an indication of the results that may be expected in the household of God. “Ill-trained, bad children reflect on any elder, not merely because they are hurtful examples to the children of the members (and non-members), but still more because they show that the father is incompetent for his office” (Lenski). “If a man cannot manage his own children whom he has reared, and whom have always been under his care, how can he manage the church of God?” (Lipscomb, p. 148). “The way in which a man controls his home reveals his capacity for leadership and government” (Kent, p. 133).

  • Must the children be merely well behaved or must they be Christians?

Paul in Titus is more specific and notes that the children must be “believing” (Titus 1:6). The expression, “that believe” refers to “a Christian” (Arndt, p. 665). In Timothy, believers are Christians (1 Timothy 4:3,10,12; 5:16). Some say the child only has to be faithful to their father, yet this is an abuse of the term believing. In addition, any grown child who has a Christian father and yet has rejected the gospel is repudiating the values of his or her father.

  • Does an elder have to have more than one child? Does the plural “children” in this passage include the elder with only one child?

If a questionnaire is sent to fathers asking, “How many children do you have?” The man with only one child would write “one”; and this reveals that the term “children” may mean “child”. Yet if the same questionnaire was sent, and it was first explained that when we say “children” we mean a plurality of children, how would the man with one child answer, having heard how the word children is being used? The answer would depend upon the context.

  • The same word rendered in Timothy and Titus children is used in other places in the New Testament where it clearly includes the singular child (Matthew 7:11; 10:21; 19:29; 22:24; 27:25; Acts 21:21; 1 Corinthians 7:14; Ephesians 6:1; Colossians 3:20 and 1 Timothy 5:4). It is clear that in the New Testament the plural children often includes the singular child, yet the question needs to be asked, “Does the singular inherently reside in the word, or is it brought out by other passages and/or the context?”
  • The primary argument for the man having only one children being qualified to serve is that “the singular is always included in the plural”. Yet plurals and singulars are not always interchangeable. The phrase “churches of Christ” (Romans 16:16) includes each individual congregation but it does not refer to only one congregation.
  • Interchanging plurals and singulars can equally get us into trouble, for the plural “elders” does pick up each individual elder that is appointed or serving, it clearly does not mean that Paul appointed only one elder (Acts 14:23), or that only one elder ruled in Philippi (Philippians 1:1).
  • Yes, the plural of teknon (children) can have a singular application, but this is not always true. The only way to determine when “children” refers to only one child is when the context and other passages would demand or allow this interpretation. Normally, the primarily meaning is a plurality of offspring. So is there anything in 1 Timothy 3 or Titus 1 or any other passages dealing with elders that would allow a secondary meaning?

  • “Must all the children believe?”

Admittedly, this is what we would all like to see, for no one would have a problem with a man whose children were all Christians. It seems to me that anything short of this opens up a number of problems, one being that we are now operating upon pure human wisdom. If all the children do not believe, then what percentage is still acceptable? The text does not say that he rules a portion of his household well.

  • “What if they fall away after they leave home?

At this point some would argue that 1 Timothy 3:4 and Titus 1:6 only apply to how the children behave when they are under this man’s roof. That whatever the child does after they leave home does not impact upon the character, or leadership ability of their father, or how they were raised. The real question here is does Titus 1:6 and 1 Timothy 3:4 only apply to the children as long as they are at home? We need to remember that these are present qualifications. Many are uncomfortable appointing a man whose children tend to fall away right after they leave home, but more comfortable appointing a man who had one of his children fall away years after leaving home. Titus 1:6 “Having children who believe”: They presently believe. Paul here states to Titus that these children must be believers but does not mention whether or not they are still at home. Remember, in first century culture, children old enough to be on their own and children with their own families were often still in the same household as their parents. “Not accused”: Not involved in and thus not under the accusation of being. “Of dissipation”: “An abandoned, dissolute life” (Thayer, p. 82). “Wastefulness” (Vine, p. 299). “debauchery” (Arndt, p. 119). “Luxury of the table, and all intemperance in the enjoyment of sensual pleasure” (Macknight, p. 364). Compare with Ephesians 5:18; Luke 15:13; 1 Peter 4:4. “Or rebellion”: Disobedient, not subject to rule, undisciplined, rebellious. “Not accused of reckless living, not wanting in obedience” (Knox); “Not open to charges of reckless living and unwillingness to obey” (Nor).

3:7 “Not a new convert": It takes time to become “apt to teach” (Hebrews 5:12-14). To feed the flock, one must know more than just the milk of the word or just the first principles of Christianity. To do battle with false teachers, one must have a working knowledge of the word, and have experience (Titus 1:9; Acts 20:29ff). The reason for this qualification is that in the first century various Jewish men became Christians who already might have possessed most of the qualifications already. Secondly, there is the temptation among Christians at times to appoint to the eldership a new convert who has a high profile in the community. “So that he will not become conceited”: Such a position of leadership and authority would be setting up this new convert for temptation. “To blind by pride and conceit” (Vincent, p. 208). “The great danger to the novice is that his sudden elevation is likely to cause him to inflate with pride” (Kent, p. 134). Please note that this new convert might be a very moral man and an extremely good husband and father, yet there is a big difference between being moral and having a spiritual maturity that is able to handle a position of leadership. 3:6 “And fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil”: This may be the type of condemnation into which the devil fell, or this may be the condemnation that the devil tries to lay for man, by luring people into sin through pride: 1 John 2:15-16. Again we see God’s wisdom. Often men try to appoint someone to a task in order to make them feel good, to make them feel welcome. The work of an elder is not merely honorary in nature. Those that become elders must be men of experience, humble men who realize their own true unimportance and importance, being an elder cannot go to their head, but must go to their feet, that is, it must motivate them toward the work.

3:7 “And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church”: Please note that the elder is a man from the community in which the congregation is located and not some administrator with headquarters in a distant city. Often people can put on a front when with other Christians and at the services. Is this man a Christian the other six days of the week? This is a man who does not let his guard down and is always faithful in all circumstances. He believes that Christianity applies to every realm of his life, including business dealings, with relatives and in-laws, during times of recreation, at the supermarket, and so on. “Too often men are selected and appointed to the eldership without regard for their reputations among those people who are not Christians. Those outside the church must consider this man a fair, honest, good, sincere, godly man. He must be right in his dealings with all men” (Phillips, p. 169).“The good which a church is capable of accomplishing in a community depends very much upon its reputation, and the reputation of the church depends much upon that of its representative men” (McGarvey, p. 64). If someone does not speak well of him, we need to remember to consider the source. Christians will make some enemies (Luke 6:26). A non-Christian’s reason for disliking a potential elder needs to be evaluated (Titus 2:8).

3:7 “So that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil”: “That he may not be exposed to scandal and get caught in the devil’s snare” (NEB). The term “reproach” means “reveling, disgrace, insult, to fall into disgrace”. And a “snare” is whatever brings peril, loss or destruction, a trap (1 Timothy 6:9; 2 Timothy 2:26). “So he may not be involved in slander and get snared by it” (Ber).

Mark Dunagan/Beaverton Church of Christ/503-644-9017
www.beavertonchurchofchrist.net/mdunagan@verizon.com

 
|Alternate Formats|  

This lesson also available as:

 Printable Version

 
|Lesson Details|
Mark Dunagan, Author
Preached on 8/1/2010
Posted on 8/2/2010
Last Updated on 8/2/2010
 

 
 
www.beavertonchurchofchrist.net   |      |  
This page last updated Saturday, January 9, 2010  |  All Content © Beaverton church of Christ and the authors noted




Church of Christ, Christian, Salvation, Baptism, Jesus Christ, Christ, Church, God, New Testament, NT, OT, Old Testament, Sermons, Marriage, Sin, Lost, Saved, Depression,
Grief, Bible, Authority, Heaven, Hell, Angels, Non-Institutional, Non-Denominational, Hope, Saved, Scripture, Father, Son, Holy Spirit, Hear, Believe, Repent, Confess, Baptized, Faithful